Short on Time? Essential Links
Daily AI Briefing for Educators
HigherEd AI Daily
Tuesday, December 30, 2025
As 2025 draws to a close, a clearer picture emerges of how AI is reshaping education. Today's briefing moves beyond the hype to examine the research, the predictions from education leaders, and the first legislative guardrails being put in place. This is the transition from experimentation to intentional design.
Today's Focus: Eight Research Papers That Changed How Educators Think About AI
Forbes compiled eight peer-reviewed papers published in 2025 that fundamentally shifted educator perspectives on AI's role in learning. These are not theoretical discussions. They challenge assumptions about skill development, learning depth, collaboration, and student well-being.
The Core Finding Across All Eight Papers: AI is not a substitute for teaching. It is a tool that amplifies either good pedagogy or poor practice. The papers show that when AI use is intentionally designed into instruction, students demonstrate gains in higher-order thinking and academic performance. When AI is used as a shortcut, it produces superficial outputs and shallow learning.
Worth Considering
One paper found that the ability to collaborate effectively with AI is a distinct competence that is not strongly related to subject knowledge. This means curriculum redesign is necessary—not to teach students to use software, but to teach them how to frame questions, interpret AI responses, and adapt their thinking in dialogue with the system.
Three Specific Insights Worth Your Attention:
On Learning Depth: A meta-analysis of 51 studies found that students performed better academically and showed gains in higher-order thinking only when AI use was explicitly designed for instruction. The key variables were subject area, duration, and teaching approach. In other words, the technology did not drive outcomes—the pedagogy did.
On Underreported Use: Research examining social desirability bias found that students routinely underreport their own AI use while claiming their peers use it extensively. The reason was embarrassment and fear of judgment. This means your institutional surveys on AI use are likely wrong, and the stigma drives AI use underground, making honest conversations about ethics impossible.
On Equity and Access: A report on AI adoption in U.S. schools found significant disparities. Teachers in affluent schools were far more likely to use AI than those in high-poverty contexts, who often lacked access, training, or clear guidance. Without deliberate policy and investment, AI risks widening existing inequalities rather than closing them.
The overarching message: These papers do not offer easy answers. What they offer is perspective. Together, they show how AI is reshaping classroom culture, assessment approaches, collaboration models, and students' sense of self in learning environments.
Platform News: 25 Education Leaders Predict AI in 2026
eSchool News gathered 25 predictions from education leaders, technology executives, and researchers about how AI will shape K-12 and higher education in 2026. The consensus emerging from their responses reveals three dominant themes:
Theme 1: From Tools to Infrastructure
The shift will accelerate from treating AI as a novelty to institutionalizing it as core infrastructure. K-12 districts will move beyond experimentation toward strategy development, policy creation, and governance guardrails. Higher education institutions will finalize infrastructure decisions about cloud versus on-premises deployment and begin measuring outcomes rather than just activity.
The shift will accelerate from treating AI as a novelty to institutionalizing it as core infrastructure. K-12 districts will move beyond experimentation toward strategy development, policy creation, and governance guardrails. Higher education institutions will finalize infrastructure decisions about cloud versus on-premises deployment and begin measuring outcomes rather than just activity.
Theme 2: Teacher Empowerment, Not Replacement
The most repeated prediction was that AI will free teachers from administrative burden, enabling them to focus on relationships with students. Multiple leaders emphasized that technology should never replace educator expertise, but rather give back time for what humans do best. One CEO noted that "nothing should ever replace a teacher's expertise—nothing ever should—but AI gives them back time to deepen relationships with students."
The most repeated prediction was that AI will free teachers from administrative burden, enabling them to focus on relationships with students. Multiple leaders emphasized that technology should never replace educator expertise, but rather give back time for what humans do best. One CEO noted that "nothing should ever replace a teacher's expertise—nothing ever should—but AI gives them back time to deepen relationships with students."
Theme 3: Equity Remains the Central Challenge
Despite optimism about AI's potential, leaders acknowledged that without deliberate policy and investment, adoption will remain uneven. The skills gap between educators and students will widen. Access will depend on district wealth. The promise of personalization will benefit only those with resources to implement it.
Despite optimism about AI's potential, leaders acknowledged that without deliberate policy and investment, adoption will remain uneven. The skills gap between educators and students will widen. Access will depend on district wealth. The promise of personalization will benefit only those with resources to implement it.
One Standout Prediction
AI literacy is becoming a competitive necessity. Multiple leaders predicted that in 2026, the conversation will shift from whether students should learn about AI to how they are being prepared to work alongside AI as a core skill. This is not an elective. It is foundational.
Research Update: Illinois Becomes First State to Ban AI-Only Teaching
Illinois passed legislation that takes effect January 1, 2026, establishing the first statewide requirement that community college courses must be taught by actual faculty members, not AI. The law is specific: colleges may not use AI programs as the sole source of instruction. However, faculty members can use AI as a teaching tool within their courses.
The legislation reflects a broader tension emerging across states. While some have moved toward embracing AI in education, Illinois chose to draw a line: human instruction is non-negotiable. The law does not ban AI from classrooms. It bans replacing instruction with AI.
Illinois also directed the State Board of Education to develop statewide guidance for K-12 districts on AI use by July 1, 2026. That guidance must include explanations of how AI works, descriptions of classroom applications, guidance on student data privacy, best practices for teaching responsible AI use, and warning about algorithmic bias and disparate impacts on special populations.
This legislation signals an important shift. Rather than asking whether AI should be in schools, policymakers are now asking: How do we ensure human oversight remains central to educational decisions? How do we protect equity? How do we preserve what makes teaching distinctly human?
What Else Is New This Week
How AI Shook the World in 2025
CNN's year-end analysis reveals that 2025 was the year AI moved from hype to serious consequence. Hundreds of billions of dollars were spent. Mental health concerns spiked among young people using AI companions. Thousands of jobs were lost as companies automated. The critical finding: AI is now influencing national policy, global trade relations, and stock market movements. The question heading into 2026 is no longer whether AI matters, but how quickly its effects are diffusing and who is being left behind.
CNN's year-end analysis reveals that 2025 was the year AI moved from hype to serious consequence. Hundreds of billions of dollars were spent. Mental health concerns spiked among young people using AI companions. Thousands of jobs were lost as companies automated. The critical finding: AI is now influencing national policy, global trade relations, and stock market movements. The question heading into 2026 is no longer whether AI matters, but how quickly its effects are diffusing and who is being left behind.
Mental Health and AI Safety Emerge as Central Concerns
Reports this year documented cases where AI chatbots contributed to mental health episodes and, in some cases, suicide among teens. OpenAI and other companies have announced parental controls and safety improvements. However, mental health experts note that without stronger guardrails—and clarity about regulatory authority between states and federal government—risks will continue to grow.
Reports this year documented cases where AI chatbots contributed to mental health episodes and, in some cases, suicide among teens. OpenAI and other companies have announced parental controls and safety improvements. However, mental health experts note that without stronger guardrails—and clarity about regulatory authority between states and federal government—risks will continue to grow.
Additional Notes
GPT-5.2 and other new models arrive with expanded capabilities. Claude Opus 4.5 achieved record benchmarks in reasoning tasks. The technical frontier continues to advance rapidly. The human and institutional frontier—how we make sense of these tools, govern their use, and ensure equitable access—is moving more slowly. That gap is the defining challenge heading into 2026.
The research papers, the predictions, and the legislation all point to the same conclusion: 2026 will not be about adopting AI. It will be about operationalizing it responsibly, equitably, and in ways that preserve what makes education fundamentally human.
A Final Reflection for Today
If the research shows that AI amplifies good pedagogy and poor practice alike, what becomes your responsibility as an educator? Is it to master the technology, or to deepen your understanding of how learning actually works so that you can choose whether and how to use AI in service of that learning?
HigherEd AI Daily
Curated by Dr. Ali Green
Curated by Dr. Ali Green
Sources: Forbes, eSchool News, CNN, Capitol News Illinois, WFYI
Visit AskThePhD.com for daily tools, tutorials, and strategies for AI in higher education.
Making AI accessible for higher education professionals, one daily insight at a time.